
By Peter J. Francis, HGPublishing Editor
The use of commas is something of an art, more than a science, and sometimes they are used differently according to different styles. That's why there is often no definitive answer about whether the usage of a comma is correct in some particular instance. However, there are certain rules that everyone should follow.
Commas are short pauses in a sentence. If you read your sentences aloud to yourself you may be able to hear your comma errors better than seeing them.
Everyone knows this one, and yet so many of us get it wrong. This is because there are two different ways to do it. When we have a list we use commas to separate items. I went to the store and bought ice cream, milk, cereal, and bread. The controversy is over the last comma. It's known as the "Oxford comma," "Harvard comma," or "serial comma." British rules apparently, often avoid this comma, but it is standard usage in American English, according to the Chicago Manual of Style. On the other hand, journalists, following the APA stylebook, eschew this comma. So what's a boy to do? If you are writing an essay using British English, leave it out; if you are American, leave it in. If you are a journalist, leave it out. If it's really important, check with an expert. I had a lawyer once explain to me: If Bill Gates dies and leaves $1 million to Bill, Bob, and Betty, they each get $333,333. But if he leaves it to Bill, Bob and Betty, Bill gets $500,000 and Bob and Betty split the other half mil. That's one expensive comma!
This is a fancy pants way to say before "and" and "or." However, there is an exception that means sometimes we ignore this rule. When the two clauses are very short we can leave out the comma. So: President Bush was elected in 2000 and he ran again successfully in 2004. But: President Bush was elected after a Supreme Court decision in 2000, and he managed a slightly larger plurality in his subsequent successful election bid in 2004.
An introductory adverb phrase is a phrase that introduces a sentence, but tells us something about a verb. You might recognize it as using "before" or "after." Example: After buying the television set, Mortimer went home and set it up. Before going to the story, Jennie checked to see if she had her wallet.
To recall, a non-restrictive clause is a clause that is not essential to the meaning of the sentence. It does not restrict the meaning. George W. Bush, elected in a controversial vote, led America into an invasion of Iraq. Stephen Harper, after a series of minority governments, finally got his majority in the Canadian Parliament in 2011. The non-restrictive element is just a little tidbit of extra information that the writer thought might be useful, but could be eliminated without damaging the meaning of the sentence.
OK, so there are four main rules for commas. Looks easy, yet people still make many errors, and can't agree on usage. Let's look at some of the common errors.
I see this a lot in complex sentences where the writer thinks a pause is necessary to help the reader understand. It is a clear sign to the marker that you don't know your subject from your predicate. I think people confuse this with the comma needed for the introductory adverbial phrase. Example: Going fishing in the morning, is a good way to greet the day. This sentence could be easily confused with a similar construction using an introductory adverbial phrase: Going fishing in the morning, Bob eagerly anticipated a breakfast of fresh trout. Note that in the second example the subject is "Bob," but in the first example the subject is "Going fishing in the morning".
This is when the writer makes the same mistake, but further along in the sentence: Bob was fishing in the morning, for trout. Don't do this, for Pete's sake! In the example "for trout" is the object complement of the verb "fishing." The addition of an averbial phrase "in the morning" does not call for a comma.
Some people seem to remember that coordinating conjunctions need commas, but they can't remember where. Example: George Bush attacked Iraq but, he never found his weapons of mass destruction.
Wrong: I went to the store and bought, ice cream, cookies, and weapons of mass destruction, for dinner.
Right: I went to the store and bought vegetables, fruit, and roast beef for dinner.
Enjoy your dinner, and use your commas safely!
If this answered your grammar question give us a Google+.
If not, then ask an editor for a free personal reply.